Committees

Member Committees of SEIU Local 509

Our Voices. Our Votes. Sign Up to Get Involved!

There’s a lot at stake for working families on the November Ballot — and we’re not sitting on the sidelines!

 

On November 4, voters will decide who will lead Massachusetts into the next four years as our new governor — as well as whether a million workers will have access to earned sick time to care for their families. Polls are tightening in contests up and down the ballot, so our actions in the coming days will make a big difference.

Here are two great ways to get involved in the coming days:

SEIU human service workers and educators are supporting Martha Coakley for governor — a proven fighter for working families.

Coakley has been an outspoken advocate for the need to invest in quality, affordable childcare and early education. She is committed to eliminating wait lists, and has stood side by side with front-line workers in our fight to improve child safety. Coakley has also fought to expand access to mental and behavioral health services – and she has pledged to improve compensation for front-line human service workers.

Click here to help elect Martha Coakley and other pro-worker candidates.



 

Question 4 — our initiative to secure Earned Sick Time — is another top priority for working families on November 4th.

Currently, a million Massachusetts workers aren’t able to earn a single paid sick day to care for themselves or a loved one. These workers face the loss of pay and perhaps their jobs if they’re ill, forcing many to go to work sick.

When we Vote YES on Question 4, Massachusetts workers will be able to earn up to 40 hours of earned sick time a year — providing families with the security they deserve and improving our our overall public health.

Click here to join the effort to secure earned sick time for all workers.



 
Our efforts will go a long way in ensuring working families’ voices are heard on Election Day. Even an hour or to at the doors or on the phone will make a big difference in close contests up and down the ballot. Please take a moment to sign up for upcoming actions!

Leave a comment

2014 General Election Endorsements

Believe it or not, General Election Day is just around the corner in Massachusetts — and the outcome of races in November could have a major impact on the issues that matter most to important to human service workers and educators. It’s important that each and every one of us get out and vote!

To help inform these important decisions, the Local 509 Committee on Political Education (COPE) spent several weeks interviewing many of the candidates who will appear on the November 4th ballot. Members questioned incumbents and challengers alike on their stances on issues ranging from social service caseloads and earned sick time to collective bargaining and private sector wages. Based on these face-to-face interviews, candidate questionnaires and voting records, COPE has endorsed a host of workers’ rights champions for offices up and down the ballot. 


For polling locations, voting information and to view which races are on the ballot in your neighborhood, type in your home address at www.wheredoivotema.com.

Local 509 Endorsements:
Statewide
MA House
MA Senate

Check out the current Legislature’s voting record on the issues that matter to 509 members:
MA House Legislative Scorecard
MA Senate Legislative Scorecard


STATEWIDE ELECTION ENDORSEMENTS

Martha Coakley Headshot_rs

Governor

Martha Coakley

Website | Facebook | Twitter

Kerrigan_200p
Lieutenant Governor

Steve Kerrigan

Website | Facebook | Twitter

Healey Headshot_rs

Attorney General

Maura Healey

Website | Facebook | Twitter


MA HOUSE ELECTION ENDORSEMENTS

Alphabetical by Last Name

509 Support Grade

 

Rep. Denise

Andrews

100%

 

Rep. James

Arciero

87%

 

Rep. Brian

Ashe

100%

 

Rep. Cory

Atkins

100%

 

Rep. Bruce

Ayers

88%

 

Rep. Ruth

Balser

100%

 

Christine

Barber

NA

 

Rep. Carlo

Basile

94%

 

Doug

Belanger

NA

 

Rep. Jennifer

Benson

100%

 

Rep. John

Binienda

95%

 

Rep. Garrett

Bradley

96%

 

Rep. Michael

Brady

100%

 

Rep. Paul

Brodeur

100%

 

Rep. Antonio

Cabral

100%

 

Rep. Tom

Calter

89%

 

Rep. Linda Dean

Campbell

84%

 

Rep. Christine

Canavan

91%

 

Rep. James

Cantwell

93%

 

Rep. Gailanne

Cariddi

100%

 

Rep. Evandro

Carvalho

100%

 

Matthew

Castriotta

NA

 

Rep. Tackey

Chan

100%

 

Rep. Nick

Collins

100%

 

Rep. Thomas

Conroy

100%

 

Rep. Edward

Coppinger

100%

 

Rep. Michael

Costello

100%

 

Rep. Claire

Cronin

100%

 

Rep. Daniel

Cullinane

100%

 

Rep. Sean

Curran

84%

 

Rep. Mark

Cusack

100%

 

Rep. Josh

Cutler

100%

 

Michael

Day

NA

 

Rep. Marjorie

Decker

100%

 

Rep. Robert

DeLeo

100%

 

Rep. Brian

Dempsey

96%

 

Rep. Marcos

Devers

100%

 

Rep. Stephen

DiNatale

95%

 

Rep. Diana

DiZoglio

100%

 

Rep. Daniel

Donahue

100%

 

Rep. Paul

Donato

96%

 

Michelle

DuBois

NA

 

Keavin

Duffy, Jr.

NA

 

Rep. James

Dwyer

94%

 

Rep. Carolyn

Dykema

94%

 

Rep. Lori

Ehrlich

94%

 

Rep. Chris

Fallon

88%

 

Rep. Tricia

Farley-Bouvier

100%

 

Rep. Robert

Fennell

92%

 

Rep. John

Fernandes

94%

 

Rep. Ann-Margaret

Ferrante

100%

 

Rep. Michael

Finn

100%

 

Christopher

Finn

NA

 

Rep. Carole

Fiola

100%

 

Rep. Gloria

Fox

100%

 

Rep. William

Galvin

100%

 

Rep. Sean

Garballey

100%

 

Rep. Denise

Garlick

100%

 

Rep. Colleen

Garry

83%

 

Rep. Anne

Gobi

92%

 

Rep. Thomas

Golden

96%

 

Rep. Kenneth

Gordon

100%

 

Rep. Danielle

Gregoire

100%

 

Beverly Ann

Griffin-Dunne

NA

 

Rep. Patricia

Haddad

100%

 

Rep. Jonathan

Hecht

100%

 

Rep. Paul

Heroux

100%

 

Ari

Herzog

NA

 

Rep. Kate

Hogan

100%

 

Rep. Russell

Holmes

100%

 

Rep. Kevin

Honan

100%

 

Rep. Daniel

Hunt

100%

 

Rep. Louis

Kafka

100%

 

Rep. Jay

Kaufman

100%

 

Rep. Mary

Keefe

100%

 

Rep. John

Keenan

100%

 

Rep. Kay

Khan

100%

 

Rep. Peter

Kocot

100%

 

Rep. Robert

Koczera

95%

 

Rep. Stephen

Kulik

100%

 

Rep. John

Lawn

100%

 

Rep. David

Linsky

100%

 

Rep. Jay

Livingstone

100%

 

Rep. Timothy

Madden

100%

 

Rep. John

Mahoney

100%

 

Rep. Liz

Malia

100%

 

Rep. Brian

Mannal

100%

 

Rep. Ronald

Mariano

96%

 

Rep. Paul

Mark

100%

 

Rep. Christopher

Markey

100%

 

Rep. Wayne

Matewsky

100%

 

Joe

McGonagle

NA

 

Rep. Aaron

Michlewitz

100%

 

Rady

Mom

NA

 

Rep. Mike

Moran

100%

 

Rep. Frank

Moran

100%

 

David

Muradian

NA

 

Rep. James

Murphy

92%

 

Rep. David

Nangle

88%

 

Rep. Harold

Naughton, Jr.

100%

 

Rep. Rhonda

Nyman

100%

 

Rep. James

O’Day

100%

 

Rep. Jerald

Parisella

100%

 

Rep. Sarah

Peake

100%

 

Rep. Alice

Peisch

100%

 

Rep. Thomas

Petrolati

95%

 

Rep. Smitty

Pignatelli

100%

 

Rep. Denise

Provost

100%

 

Rep. Angelo

Puppolo

90%

 

Gene

Rauhala

NA

 

Rep. John

Rogers

92%

 

Rep. David

Rogers

100%

 

Rep. Dennis

Rosa

93%

 

Rep. Jeffrey

Roy

100%

 

Rep. Byron

Rushing

100%

 

Rep. Daniel

Ryan

100%

 

Rep. Jeffrey

Sanchez

100%

 

Rep. Tom

Sannicandro

100%

 

Rep. Angelo

Scaccia

96%

 

Rep. Paul

Schmid

100%

 

Rep. John

Scibak

100%

 

Rep. Alan

Silvia

100%

 

Rep. Frank

Smizik

100%

 

Rep. Theodore

Speliotis

96%

 

Rep. Thomas

Stanley

88%

 

Rep. Ellen

Story

100%

 

Rep. William

Straus

96%

 

Rep. Benjamin

Swan

100%

 

Matthew

Terry

NA

 

Rep. Walter

Timilty

88%

 

Rep. Timothy

Toomey, Jr.

100%

 

Jose

Tosado

NA

 

Rep. Cleon

Turner

95%

 

Rep. Aaron

Vega

100%

 

Rep. John

Velis

100%

 

Rep. RoseLee

Vincent

100%

 

Rep. Joseph

Wagner

91%

 

Rep. Chris

Walsh

100%

 

Rep. Jonathan

Zlotnik

100%

 





MA SENATE ELECTION ENDORSEMENTS

Alphabetical by Last Name

509 Support Grade

 

Sen. William

Brownsberger

90%

Sen. Gale

Candaras

95%

Sen. Harriette

Chandler

96%

Sen. Sonia

Chang-Diaz

100%

Sen. Cynthia

Creem

100%

Sen. Sal

DiDomenico

100%

Sen. Kenneth

Donnelly

100%

Sen. Eileen

Donoghue

90%

Sen. Linda

Dorcena-Forry

100%

Sen. Benjamin

Downing

100%

Sen. James

Eldridge

100%

Sen. Barry

Finegold

100%

Sen. Jennifer

Flanagan

89%

Rep. Anne M.

Gobi

92%

*based on House voting record

Dylan

Hayre

NA

Sen. Pat

Jehlen

100%

Sen. John

Keenan

100%

Sen. Thomas

Kennedy

94%

Barbara

L’Italien

NA

Patrick

Leahy

NA

Eric

Lesser

NA

Sen. Jason

Lewis

100%

Sen. Joan

Lovely

100%

Sen. Tom

McGee

100%

Sen. Mark

Montigny

88%

Sen. Michael

Moore

89%

Sen. Pres. Therese

Murray

89%

Sen. Kathleen

O’Connor-Ives

100%

Sen. Marc

Pacheco

92%

Sen. Anthony

Petruccelli

95%

Sen. Michael

Rodrigues

92%

Sen. Stanley

Rosenberg

100%

Sen. Michael

Rush

91%

Sen. Karen

Spilka

96%

Sen. James

Welch

100%

Sen. Daniel

Wolf

100%

 



Questions? Need additional information? Contact the Local 509 Legislative & Political Department at (617) 924-8509 x515 or email ccondon@seiu509.org.

Leave a comment

The REAL Charlie Baker Record: Get the Facts

Leave a comment

MacKinnon: “Charlie Baker’s DCF failed our kids; we can’t afford to fail them again.”

Remarks of Peter MacKinnon, DCF Chapter President

As prepared for delivery October 6, 2014

Good morning. My name is Peter MacKinnon. I’ve worked in child protection for nearly twenty years – now as a social work supervisor in DCF’s Lowell office. I also serve as President of the Department of Children and Families Chapter of SEIU Local 509.

For much of the last year, there has been a lot of attention paid to child protection efforts in Massachusetts – from the worsening caseload crisis to outdated policies and technology. And while the issues involved were not new, recent tragedies brought light to challenges child protection veterans have raised for many years.

As Election Day approaches, voters rightly want their next Governor to be able to tackle these challenges – to provide the resources, leadership, and accountability that the Department of Children and Families needs to keep at-risk kids safe from abuse and neglect. This is a vital test, as so many innocent lives depend on the decisions and priorities of our elected officials.

When Charlie Baker had the chance to lead, he failed that vital test.

First as Secretary of Health & Human Services and then as Secretary of Administration and Finance, Charlie Baker was responsible for the Department of Social Services, now called DCF.  With Charlie Baker in charge, DSS was in turmoil.

So Baker’s boss – Governor Weld – appointed a Special Commission to perform a full investigation of the department.  It was tasked with conducting an extensive independent review of child protection efforts in the Commonwealth.

What they found was an agency on the edge of collapse. A caseload crisis worse than today’s. Widespread management failures and a total lack of support for front-line social workers and investigators. Kids exposed to repeated abuse and neglect.

You don’t need take my word for it.  These are the conclusions of commission investigators, direct from their report on Charlie Baker’s DCF. Among their observations:

“DSS is in the midst of an organizational breakdown”
“The department stands virtually paralyzed”
“Unable to effectively service children and families”
“years of deterioration…recently exacerbated to the edge of collapse by leadership and management failures”
“Staff deprived of needed resources, unsupported by management, and overloaded with critical cases”
“As a result of those multiple failures…children have suffered increasing developmental failures and behavioral disturbances…”

These problems did not all begin and end with Charlie Baker. But, like all leaders, the actions Baker took – and didn’t take – in response to these findings were, and are, 100% his responsibility.

The Legislature, in response to this report, allocated additional funding to hire more social workers, reduce caseloads, and help stabilize the agency.  That put the ball in Baker’s court.

So what did Charlie Baker do while leading an agency on the verge of collapse? What did he do now that he had the financial resources and support to begin fixing it? He ignored all the warnings and sent millions of dollars back to the General Fund – money that had been dedicated to child protection.

So even when he was given the chance to fix this colossal mess at DCF – a mess he played a role in creating – Charlie Baker’s priorities were elsewhere.

Child welfare advocates actually had to sue to force Baker’s Administration to do the right thing – and an Arbitrator awarded nearly $2 million in damages as a result.

The simple fact is the failures of DCF under Charlie Baker set the stage for the crisis we face today.

There are a bunch of Republicans in Washington DC spending millions of dollars to hide the truth about the candidates’ records on child protection. But no matter how much they may spend on ads, they can’t paper over the truth of Charlie Baker’s failed record at DCF.

When faced with a real opportunity and real resources, Charlie Baker’s DCF failed our kids. And today, we face a similar opportunity with real resources and the will for reform. We can’t afford to fail our kids again.

Leave a comment

MEMO: Five questions for Charlie Baker on his record of failure at DCF

Click here to download a printable version.

TO:                   Interested Parties
FROM:            Jason A. Stephany
DATE:             October 3, 2014
RE:                   Five questions for Charlie Baker on his record of failure at DCF


Despite widespread calls from child protection experts and victims’ rights advocates, Charlie Baker has yet to disavow a false attack ad launched by national Republicans. But even more disturbing is Baker’s own record at the very agency his fellow national Republicans target in their ad – the Department of Children & Families (then Department of Social Services). In the spirit of the transparency Baker often invokes, here are five key questions Massachusetts voters have yet to receive answers to regarding Charlie Baker’s record of failure at DCF:

1. Why was the DCF caseload crisis worse under Baker’s Administration than it is today?  
On Charlie Baker’s watch, child protection caseloads consistently outpaced safe standards. Each month, as many as half of department workers carried crisis-level workloads of 20 cases or more. Baker watched the caseload crisis unfold – a situation that outpaced even today’s crisis – yet relief only came after front-line workers filed suit to force his Administration to act. (DCF caseload data, Commonwealth of Mass., 1990-97)

2. Why did the Baker Administration mislead legislators on the severity of his caseload crisis?
Baker’s caseload crisis spiraled so far out of control that front-line social workers and investigators mounted a legal challenge, hoping to force the Administration to take action. An independent Arbitrator ruled that Baker’s Administration “repeatedly failed to request funding to meet the standards” of child safety contracts – and that “the legislature was also given misleading information” about the caseload crisis at DCF/DSS. (DSS Caseload Arbitration #2022, OER 94-0672 & OER 94-0690)

3. Why did the Baker Administration refuse to sufficiently fund child protection programs?
The Baker Administration repeatedly refused to request and allot sufficient funding to safely staff the state’s child protection programs. In fact, Baker’s Administration returned funds allotted by the legislature for DCF/DSS child protection programs and staffing, sending the money back to the general fund through a process they termed ‘reversion’.  (DSS Caseload Arbitration #2022, OER 94-0672 & OER 94-0690)

4. How does Baker explain the $1.9 million in damages awarded as a result of his ‘reversion’ scheme?
Despite the Baker Administration’s refusal to request adequate funds, the legislature allotted millions to boost child protection staffing and related resources in the 1995-96 budget. But the Baker team rejected much of the funding, instead sending the money back to the General Fund to be used for other purposes. An independent Arbitrator ultimately awarded nearly $2 million in damages over Baker’s reversion scheme.  (DSS Caseload Arbitration #2022, OER 94-0672 & OER 94-0690)

5. Why did Baker allow a ‘systemwide breakdown’ in key services that improve child safety?
As Secretary of Health & Human Services, Charlie Baker oversaw repeated cuts to preventive and treatment programs that play a large role in overall child protection. Among the key services slashed were those in the Department of Youth Services, mental health treatment and substance abuse abatement programs.

A prominent Globe Editorial referred to Baker’s cuts as “chilling figures that suggest a systemwide breakdown,” and warned that the situation “will worsen if the state’s health and human service officials continue to focus on savings at the expense of good clinical care.” (An Abandonment of Decency, Boston Globe, 6/14/1995)

 

SEIU Local 509 represents front-line social workers, investigators and supervisors at the Department of Children & Families – along with more than 17,000 other human service workers and educators throughout the commonwealth.

Leave a comment

Local 509 Endorses Martha Coakley for Governor

SEIU EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS ENDORSE MARTHA COAKLEY FOR GOVERNOR
 
LAWRENCE — Martha Coakley today received the endorsement of Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 509, based on her commitment to providing all of our children with early education and our workers with earned sick time.  The endorsement builds on the campaign’s momentum following Coakley winning the Democratic nomination for governor last week.
“From our efforts to improve child safety to the fight to expand access to early education, Martha Coakley has been with us every step of the way,” said Susan Tousignant, president of the Massachusetts Union for Human Service Workers and Educators, SEIU Local 509. “We need leaders like Martha Coakley who understand the issues that matter most to working parents — and we are proud to endorse her as our next Governor.”
“Martha Coakley understands the important fight to eliminate the wait list for affordable early education and child care. Educators and parents, all of us, have a great partner in Martha Coakley,” said Dulce Espejo, a veteran early childhood educator from Lawrence.
“I look forward to continuing my work with the hard working men and women of 509, as we create a more fair and prosperous Commonwealth by providing all of our children with quality early and ed and our workers with earned sick time,” said Coakley.
The Union for Human Service Workers and Educators in Massachusetts, SEIU Local 509, represents over 17,000 workers throughout the Commonwealth. SEIU 509 members provide a variety of educational and social services to at-risk children, elders and people with mental illnesses and developmental disabilities. Local 509 is part of the Service Employees International Union, the largest and fastest-growing labor union in the United States.
The 509 endorsement adds to the thousands of workers across the state working to elect Coakely, including Teamsters 25, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) 103 and 223, Utility Workers Union of America (UWUA) 369, Massachusetts Coalition of Police, Massachusetts Police Association, Sheetmetal Workers Local 63, 1199SEIU Healthcare Workers East., New England Regional Council of Carpenters, Painters and Allied Trades District Council #35, AFSCME Council 93 and 32BJ SEIU. 
Leave a comment

SEIU 509 COPE Endorses Steve Kerrigan for Lieutenant Governor

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, September 5, 2014
Contact: Jason A Stephany, (617) 286-4430, jstephany@seiu509.org

SEIU Human Service Workers, Educators Endorse Kerrigan for Lieutenant Governor

Kerrigan speaks to human service workers at LifeLinks, Inc. workers before joining the picket line. (Aug 21, 2014)

Kerrigan speaks to human service workers at LifeLinks, Inc. workers before joining the picket line. (Aug 21, 2014)

Union cites hands-on leadership style, outspoken advocacy on behalf of workers’ rights

WATERTOWN, MA – The Mass. Union for Human Service Workers and Educators, SEIU Local 509 Committee on Political Education (COPE), today announced its endorsement of Steve Kerrigan in the race for Lieutenant Governor – citing his hands-on leadership and outspoken advocacy around key issues of importance to working families.

SEIU Local 509 represents more than 17,000 human service workers and educators throughout Massachusetts, and is among the Commonwealth’s most progressive and politically active labor organizations. The union has a proud history of aggressive primary endorsements that have made a difference in major electoral contests – from the first campaign of Governor Deval Patrick to the recent election of Boston Mayor Marty Walsh.

“From our shared efforts to improve child safety to the fight to expand access to early education, Steve Kerrigan isn’t afraid to stand up and speak out on the issues that matter most,” said Christine Crean, Chair of the SEIU Local 509 Committee on Public Education (COPE) and a longtime social worker. “Working families have a true champion in Steve Kerrigan, and we are proud to endorse him as our next Lieutenant Governor.”

SEIU human service workers and educators participated in a transparent, member-driven endorsement process for races up and down the ballot – including forums, questionnaires and face-to-face meetings with the candidates. In the race for Lieutenant Governor, Kerrigan stood far above other candidates in his willingness to directly engage with workers and seek solutions to complicated challenges.

“Steve Kerrigan was right there with us on the picket lines, doing everything he could to support workers in our fight for fair wages and dignity on the job.” said Deborah Martin, a veteran day habilitation specialist who helped lead the successful August strike at LifeLinks, Inc. “That’s exactly the kind of Lieutenant Governor we need – someone who will roll up his sleeves and do whatever it takes to get the job done.”

 

“As someone who was raised in a strong union household, I’m proud to have stood with working people my entire career – in local, state and federal government – and I’m thrilled to have the support of the human service workers and educators of SEIU Local 509,” said Kerrigan. “The issues facing these front-line workers are real and they need a voice in the Corner Office who will be with them, work with them and, when needed, stand with them. I’m honored to be that candidate and I’ll be honored to be that Lieutenant Governor.”

 

The Union for Human Service Workers and Educators in Massachusetts, SEIU Local 509, represents over 17,000 workers throughout the commonwealth. SEIU 509 members provide a variety of educational and social services to at-risk children, elders and people with mental illnesses and developmental disabilities. Local 509 is part of the Service Employees International Union, the largest and fastest-growing labor union in the United States.

- ### -

Leave a comment

SHNS | Study Examines State Spending on Employee Health Insurance

The average per-employee monthly premium for coverage of state government employees in the United States was $963 in 2013, according to a study of state spending on employee coverage, which pegged the average in Massachusetts at $1,089.

The study, by the Pew Charitable Trusts and the MacArthur Foundation, was released Tuesday with its authors hoping to inform public policy debates and decisions with new information. The study’s authors told reporters in a conference call Tuesday that management of state employee health benefits affects the fiscal health of states, the ability to recruit and retain employees, and the physical, mental and financial well being of workers.

The study found the average employer premium contribution percentage across 49 states at 84 percent, with the average state employee premium contribution percentage at 16 percent. In Massachusetts, that split was 75 percent employer and 25 percent employee. The average total premium across the states for employees plus dependents was $1,238, compared to $1,418 in Massachusetts.

States collectively spent $30.8 billion to insure 2.7 million employee households in 2013.

 

Other Resources:
Read the full study on State Employee Health Plan Spending via Pew Charitable Trust.
Learn more about state employee benefits through the Massachusetts Group Insurance Commission.

Leave a comment

2014-15 SEIU Local 509 Scholarship Details & Application

The SEIU Local 509 Scholarship Program funds educational scholarship awards for members and their dependents. Dependents are defined as children of members, or children under direct care of the member — such as a grandchild or foster child.  Apply by June 1, 2014.

Leave a comment

Boston Globe | Not your grandpa’s labor union

Not Your Grandpa's Union ImageThe Ideas section of April 6th’s Boston Globe took on the challenges and opportunities presented by our 21st century workforce — a landscape where traditional employer-employee relationships have become more exception than norm. Author Leon Neyfakh details a host of new initiatives that aim to organize workers in this new reality, including those of healthcare professionals, adjunct professors and service industry subcontractors.

From the Neyfakh’s ‘Not your grandpa’s labor union’:

Unionization efforts have also been successful among some graduate students and medical residents, who have had to convince the institutions they work for to recognize them as employees, rather than categorize their teaching or hospital work as merely educational. Adjunct professors, who have been able to find only low-paying freelance teaching jobs after finishing degrees, have also formed unions recently. Meanwhile, the large number of doctors who in recent years have effectively gone from business-owners to employees after selling or leasing once-independent practices to hospitals are being targeted for recruitment by the Union of American Physicians and Dentists…

…In all these cases, labor experts say, what we’re seeing is evidence of a struggle to establish clarity about what constitutes employment, and an effort to reduce the ambiguity surrounding the relationship between workers and the entities that wield power over them. That is what’s happening with fast-food workers, who have been striking for higher wages since last December, and who have been told by industry executives to address their grievances to the owners of the individual franchises that employ them. Organizers counter that franchise workers should be recognized as employees of the parent companies, instead; if they were, they could potentially organize on a much larger scale.

Leave a comment